What is the FRDCSA?"FRDCSA" stands for "Formalized Research Database: Cluster, Study and Apply".
Cluster: The FRDCSA is a large collection of software (codebases) that is actively maintained and expanded using a variety of methods (see RADAR Internal Codebase ).
Study: Depending on licensing, packages or installers are semi-automatically created for each codebase. (see Packager Internal Codebase )
Apply: Packaged systems are then used to solve existing problems. (see Architect Internal Codebase )
The archive can be accessed either manually, or preferably, if you have "apt", by adding the following line to the /etc/apt/sources.list file:
deb http://services.frdcsa.org/debian unstable/
FRDCSA Technical Motivation
While the technical reference is still being written, please read the following two sources: Wikipedia article [mirror] on Algorithmic Information Theory , and Chaitin's paper [mirror]. It is very important that one understand this paper. If one understands the major concepts in this paper, then there are only a few more concepts required to completely understand why we need to package software.
Specifically, note the section which states: "The approach of this paper, in contrast, is to measure the power of a set of axioms, to measure the information that it contains. We shall see that there are circumstances in which one only gets out of a set of axioms what one puts in, and in which it is possible to reason in the following manner. If a set of theorems constitutes t bits of information, and a set of axioms contains less than t bits of information, then it is impossible to deduce these theorems from these axioms."
Simply replace "theorems" with "problems", "axioms" with "programs", and "deduce" with "solve" to understand the general necessity of having more software.
A.K.A.: If a set of problems constitutes t bits of information, and a set of programs contains less than t bits of information, then it is impossible to solve these problems from these programs."
So, increasing the information that our set of programs contains is necessary to solve increasingly complex problems. The FRDCSA thesis held by members of the FRDCSA says given the extent of free software, packaging this software is a necessary step of any practical attempt by our group to increase our solution space. It is not sufficient, therefore we are writing numerous systems to help us glue the functionality of the software together where necessary.
Although it represents almost 20 years of research, the FRDCSA is still in its beginning phases. Check back frequently for additional functionality. Help is sincerely needed in getting all these packages made. Packages are necessary in order to quickly and conveniently access the capabilities of software systems. If you would like to help make packages or join our group, please send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
The following reading has been very useful in giving us an understanding of how to go about solving problems.
FAQWhat sort of solutions are we looking to create, for what sort of problems?
Who all's involved?
What sort of resources do we have to work with?
What do we need to tackle short term?
What's the next step.
How is this project different than Sourceforge?
How is this project different than CPAN?
QWhat sort of solutions are we looking to create, for what sort of problems?
AThere are a few central aims of our project. Since we hold the belief that software must be reused, and that key to this reuse is a central package repository, we aim to solve the problems necessary to:
How do we limit which types of problems we aim to solve? Well, eventually we would like the computer to define an ontology of problems, and be able to do planning. Until we have such software, however, we are simply using our intuitition. Our main focus currently is recruiting the core group of programmers and packagers, since we feel that our purpose is well-defined but impractical without a software development team focused on achieving the above 3 goals. These goals simplify somewhat the actual nature of the problems, which we cannot yet summarise, so you might already be thinking about some of the limitations of the above 3 goals. Check out our internal codebases to get a better picture of the state of our approach.
QWho all's involved?
AThe project was initiated by a socially disabled college student in his first year of college (1998), and has been in progress for 20 years, developing the theory, central goals and various software for the project. It is based on results in mathematical logic, recursion theory and proof theory.
Once I am organized I will see what kind of interest exists in the online community.
QWhat sort of resources do we have to work with?
AWe have about 20 computers with performant specifications.
QWhat do we need to tackle short term?
A(COMPLETED) The completion of the planning system.
QWhat's the next step.
AOur next step is deployment of the Alexa service and the http://freelifeplanner.org associated website.
QHow is this project different than Sourceforge?.
AGood question. We make extensive use of the resources that Sourceforge provides. Sourceforge is a great repository of online software, but it does not do certain things that we need. First, it does not actively locate software by spidering the web, rather, the authors of software must register their product. So, by spidering the web and their resources, we can actually create a comprehensive software ontology that includes software that is not found on Sourceforge. Secondly, it does not always provide packages for their software.
QHow is this project different than CPAN?.
ACPAN is the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network. While many of interal codebases happen to be written in Perl, the majority of external codebases are not. Our system is also different from the main Debian archive in that our applications have much lower quality standards, since we don't have the talent or man power of Debian. However, we do fill a role in that we make rough packages for end users, in the hopes that we can help them to solve their problems. In this way, users are more likely to find what they are looking for and not to redouble efforts, as this is wasteful to the world.
Andrew J. Dougherty Last modified: Fri Feb 2 21:53:07 EST 2018